Architecture as a social mixer: Designing spaces that foster spontaneous interaction and interdisciplinary exchange.
Innovation rarely happens in isolation. It occurs at the boundaries between disciplines. The primary goal of a Neuroengineering center is to force these collisions between clinicians, engineers, biologists, and data scientists.
MIT Professor Thomas Allen discovered a remarkably consistent relationship: the frequency of communication between engineers drops exponentially with distance. Beyond 50 meters, communication probability is near zero.
Seeing others at work increases the likelihood of interaction ("passive awareness"). Glass partitions, atriums, and open areas reduce the psychological distance between floors and departments. (but people hate being watched so this is confusing or maybe it's more complicated than this.)
Design Implication: Don't segregate departments by floor (e.g., "Engineers on 2, Biologists on 3"). Instead, create mixed "neighborhoods" or use a central atrium to visually connect them.
"It's that through the team, through that group of incredibly talented people bumping up against each other, having arguments, having fights sometimes, making some noise, and working together they polish each other and they polish the ideas," — Steve Jobs
Serendipity is not magic; it is a probabilistic function of overlapping paths. We can increase the probability of "happy accidents" through spatial layout:
Space Syntax theory suggests that the configuration of space itself creates a "social logic."
The source of the "Allen Curve." Even in the digital age, physical proximity remains the best predictor of collaboration.
Space is the MachineFoundational text on Space Syntax and how spatial configuration drives social movement.
Planning for ChanceEmpirical study linking spatial configuration (visibility, accessibility) to frequency of face-to-face consultation in research centers.